Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Musso, PhD's avatar

What a rich discussion, thanks to you both. I happen to be a huge fan of Wittgenstein, especially his late philosophy.

Expand full comment
Azark's avatar

I agree largely! At a certain point we must build our own worldview, a functioning philosophy to traverse the world.

I disagree, though, that a microphilosophy should be inherently coherent without contradiction. I think we can have different selves within us coexisting, and not just one unified self. The tension between different ideas is what lets us learn and adapt and grow. Besides, I think it's ok to not have some things sorted out - to exist in uncertainty. I don't know if I believe in a god or not but I'm open to it. But nothing revolves around this mere idea shift, because I intend to do good with my life anyway. Something about contradiction is inherently human - we should not try to cut off all dissenting voices and go with the loudest one, we should instead support an internal dialogue.

Same thing with principles, no one thing will always be good. Say you're a governmental agent with codes to a nuclear bomb, and a criminal is threatening you. Should you be honest? No, millions of lives would be at stake. No one principal can provide a framework for all of the chaos of life, unless it's a principle of adaptivity, or one to describe *most* scenarios.

Expand full comment
62 more comments...

No posts